The next five seasons will determine whether the Netherlands’ resurgence into Europe’s top six leagues represents a sustainable new reality or merely a temporary peak before inevitable decline. The mathematics are unforgiving, the competition is improving, and the margin for error is razor-thin. Understanding what lies ahead—the guaranteed periods, the critical junctures, and the scenarios that could reshape Dutch football’s European standing—is essential for anyone invested in the Eredivisie’s continental ambitions.
This isn’t speculation. The coefficient system’s five-year rolling window means we can project, with reasonable accuracy, what must happen for Dutch football to maintain, improve, or lose its hard-won position among Europe’s elite.
The Guaranteed Period: 2025-26 and 2026-27
Thanks to securing 6th place through the 2023-24 season and maintaining it with the strong 2024-25 campaign (15.250 points), the Netherlands has locked in its current allocation for two more seasons.
What’s Guaranteed Through 2026-27
European allocation:
- 2 direct Champions League league phase spots (champion + runner-up)
- 1 Champions League qualifying spot (3rd place)
- 2 Europa League spots (1 direct for cup winner, 1 qualifying)
- 1 Conference League spot (via playoff)
- 6 total European participants
Financial security: This two-year buffer provides crucial breathing room worth approximately €100-120 million annually across all Dutch clubs when factoring in:
- Two direct Champions League entries (~€80-100 million combined)
- Additional Europa and Conference League participants (~€20-30 million)
- UEFA solidarity payments based on 6th place ranking (~€15-20 million)
Strategic value: Clubs can make long-term planning decisions knowing the European landscape won’t shift beneath them. Ajax can recruit players promising Champions League football (if they finish top-2). Mid-table clubs can invest knowing six European spots will be available. Transfer strategies and wage structures can be built on stable foundations.
This certainty is valuable precisely because what comes after 2026-27 is far less secure.
The Critical Juncture: 2027-28 Allocation
The allocation for the 2027-28 season will be determined by the coefficient rankings at the end of the 2025-26 season. This is when the mathematics become concerning for Dutch football.
The Ticking Time Bomb: Losing the 19.200-Point Season
When the 2026-27 ranking is calculated (after the 2025-26 season concludes), the historic 2021-22 campaign—which produced 19.200 points—will drop out of the five-year window entirely.
Current five-year total (including 2024-25): ~67.150 points
- 2020-21: 9.200
- 2021-22: 19.200
- 2022-23: 13.500
- 2023-24: 10.000
- 2024-25: 15.250
Projected five-year total after 2025-26:
Assume the Netherlands produces a respectable 13.000 points in 2025-26:
- 2021-22: 19.200 (DROPS OFF)
- 2022-23: 13.500
- 2023-24: 10.000
- 2024-25: 15.250
- 2025-26: 13.000 (projected)
New total: 51.750 points
Net change: -15.400 points
This dramatic drop would occur despite a decent 2025-26 performance, simply because the exceptional season aged out of calculation. The Netherlands would fall from ~67 points to ~52 points in one year—not because Dutch clubs performed poorly, but because of how the rolling window works.
Portugal’s Competitive Position
Portugal’s five-year breakdown doesn’t include any season as explosive as the Netherlands’ 19.200. Their scores have been steadier: typically 10-12 points annually, with their 2024-25 season reaching approximately 16.250.
Portugal’s advantage:
When Portugal’s oldest season (2020-21, which scored approximately 9.200) drops off and is replaced by their projected 2025-26 season (estimate 13.000-14.000), their net change is positive:
Portugal projected net change: +4.000 to +5.000
Meanwhile, Netherlands net change: -6.200
The gap analysis:
Current gap (including 2024-25): Netherlands 67.150 vs Portugal 62.266 = 4.884 points
After 2025-26 with above projections:
- Netherlands: ~60.950
- Portugal: ~66.266 to ~67.266
Portugal could overtake the Netherlands for 6th place.
What This Means for 2027-28 Allocation
If Portugal overtakes the Netherlands, the allocation consequences are immediate and severe:
Netherlands drops to 7th place allocation:
- 1 direct Champions League spot (champion only – LOSES runner-up direct entry)
- 1 Champions League qualifying spot (runner-up)
- 2 Europa League spots
- 1-2 Conference League spots
- 5 total European spots (LOSES one participant)
Financial impact: Approximately €80 million annually
- Runner-up facing qualifiers instead of direct entry: ~€30-40 million risk/loss
- One fewer European participant: ~€10-15 million
- Reduced UEFA solidarity payments: ~€10-15 million
- Commercial and prestige losses: ~€20-30 million
Competitive impact:
- Dutch runner-up must fight through July/August qualifiers (fatigue, risk)
- One fewer club experiencing Europe (reduced coefficient opportunities)
- Psychological blow of “falling back” after reaching 6th
Best Case Scenario: Maintaining or Improving Position
For the Netherlands to maintain 6th place or even challenge France for 5th, specific performance benchmarks must be met:
Performance Requirements for Maintaining 6th Place
2025-26 season needs:
- Minimum 14.000 points, ideally 15.000+
- At least 2-3 clubs reaching Champions League/Europa League quarter-finals
- All qualifying teams successfully reaching league phases
- One club making a semi-final in any competition
2026-27 season needs:
- Maintain 14.000-16.000 point range
- Continued deep runs from multiple clubs
- Avoid catastrophic failures (multiple early qualifying exits)
What this requires practically:
From the big three (Ajax, PSV, Feyenoord):
- Consistent Champions League group stage presence
- At least one club reaching CL knockouts annually
- Strong Europa League performances when applicable
- Treating European competition as equal priority to domestic success
From the supporting cast (AZ, Twente, Utrecht, etc.):
- Winning qualifying rounds to reach league phases
- Respectable group stage performances (3-4 points minimum)
- Occasional deep runs (one quarter-final every 2-3 years)
Collective effort:
- All six European participants contributing points
- No clubs “wasting” their European spot with zero-point campaigns
- Continued fixture scheduling cooperation
- Strategic squad management for European optimization
The Path to 5th Place: A Long Shot
France currently sits at approximately 66.831 points (after 2023-24), likely 70+ including 2024-25. Breaking into the top five would grant the Netherlands:
- 7 total European spots (up from 6)
- 4 Champions League participants (up from 3)
- 3 direct Champions League entries (up from 2)
What it would require:
Scenario 1 – French collapse: France’s clubs collectively underperform for 2-3 consecutive seasons (scoring 10-12 points annually) while Dutch clubs excel (16-18 points). This seems unlikely given PSG’s consistent Champions League presence and the depth of French football.
Scenario 2 – Dutch explosion: The Netherlands produces another 2021-22-level season (19+ points) while maintaining strong supporting seasons. This would require multiple Dutch clubs reaching semi-finals in the same year—possible but difficult.
Realistic assessment: Reaching 5th place is unlikely in the next 3-5 years. The top five leagues have structural advantages (revenue, player quality, depth) that mid-ranked nations can’t easily overcome. The Netherlands’ realistic goal is maintaining 6th, not climbing to 5th.
Worst Case Scenario: Falling to 7th or 8th
The nightmare scenario involves one or two poor European seasons coinciding with strong performances from Portugal and Belgium.
How the Netherlands Could Drop to 7th
The formula:
- Netherlands scores 9-10 points in 2025-26 (similar to 2023-24)
- Portugal scores 15-16 points
- After the 19.200-point season drops off, Netherlands total: ~54-55 points
- Portugal total: ~67-68 points
Result: Portugal overtakes Netherlands for 6th place
2027-28 allocation impact: As detailed above, Netherlands loses one direct Champions League spot and one total European place.
How the Netherlands Could Drop to 8th
This requires compounding failures:
Year 1 (2025-26):
- Netherlands scores 9.000 points
- Portugal scores 15.000 points
- Belgium scores 16.000 points
Year 2 (2026-27):
- Netherlands scores 10.000 points
- Belgium maintains 15.000+ points
Result: Both Portugal and Belgium overtake Netherlands
8th place allocation:
- 1 direct Champions League spot (champion only)
- 1 Champions League qualifying spot (runner-up)
- 1-2 Europa League spots
- 1-2 Conference League spots
- 5 total European spots
The difference between 6th and 8th is roughly €100 million annually when accounting for all revenue streams and the reduced coefficient opportunities from fewer participants.
Triggers for Decline
Ajax’s continued struggles: As the Netherlands’ historically strongest European club, Ajax should reliably contribute 3-4 coefficient points annually. Their recent instability—managerial turnover, financial issues, poor results—means they’re not providing expected returns. If Ajax fails to qualify for Europe or exits qualifying rounds, it’s a massive coefficient liability.
Qualifying round failures: When clubs entering via qualifiers (3rd place in Champions League, 5th in Europa League, playoff winners in Conference League) fail to reach league phases, the Netherlands loses dozens of potential points. Each qualifying failure costs approximately 2-3 points worth of league phase matches.
Belgium’s trajectory continuing: Belgium has outscored the Netherlands in recent seasons (15.650 vs 15.250 in 2024-25). If this becomes a pattern rather than an anomaly, Belgium will eventually close the 12-point gap and challenge for 7th place by 2027-28, and potentially 6th by 2028-29.
Compounding psychological effects: If the Netherlands drops to 7th, the reduced allocation makes it harder to climb back. Fewer European spots means fewer coefficient opportunities. The runner-up facing qualifiers means potential fatigue and early elimination. Success becomes harder to achieve, creating a potential downward spiral.
What Dutch Clubs Must Do: Specific Requirements
Maintaining 6th place requires measurable achievements. Here’s what needs to happen:
Champions League Participants (Ajax, PSV, Feyenoord typically)
Minimum requirements:
- Reach league phase (qualify if necessary)
- Win at least 3 of 8 league phase matches
- Earn 8-10 points minimum (match results + bonuses)
Target performance:
- One club reaches Round of 16 annually
- One club reaches quarter-finals every 2-3 years
- Combined 15-20 points from all Champions League participants
Strategic imperatives:
- Treat Champions League as equal priority to Eredivisie title race
- Squad depth to compete on both fronts
- Tactical preparation for European opponents
- Retain key players through at least age 23-24
Europa League Participants (4th-5th place finishers typically)
Minimum requirements:
- Successfully navigate qualifying rounds
- Reach league phase consistently
- Win 2-3 league phase matches minimum
Target performance:
- One club reaches quarter-finals every 2-3 years
- Combined 6-8 points from Europa League participants
Strategic imperatives:
- Prioritize Europa League when fixture congestion hits
- Early summer preparation for qualifiers
- Squad building with European depth in mind
Conference League Participants (Playoff winners, occasional higher finishers)
Minimum requirements:
- Win qualifying rounds to reach league phase
- Competitive group stage performance (not finishing last)
- 2-3 points minimum from match results
Target performance:
- Quarter-final appearance every 3-4 years
- One semi-final or final run per 5-6 years (like Feyenoord 2022, AZ 2023)
- 4-6 points in successful campaigns
Strategic imperatives:
- Take Conference League seriously (not “lesser” competition)
- View it as realistic path to silverware and coefficient points
- Invest in squad quality sufficient for deep runs
Collective Requirements
All clubs must:
- Field strong lineups in European matches (no “rest” games)
- Begin pre-season earlier to be ready for July qualifiers
- Share tactical intelligence about upcoming opponents
- Support fixture rescheduling that benefits European participants
- Accept that coefficient protection is everyone’s responsibility
The league must:
- Continue adjusting schedules for European participants
- Provide financial incentives for European success (coefficient bonuses)
- Invest in referee development (better domestic referees = better preparation for European standards)
- Market Eredivisie internationally to increase revenue that funds competitive squads
Potential Opportunities
Despite the challenges, several factors could work in Dutch football’s favor:
The European Performance Spot System
UEFA now awards two extra Champions League spots annually to the countries with the best single-season coefficients. The Netherlands came close in 2021-22 (second-best in Europe).
Opportunity: If multiple Dutch clubs have exceptional seasons simultaneously—say Ajax reaches Champions League semi-finals, Feyenoord wins Europa League, and PSV makes Conference League finals—the Netherlands could earn a bonus Champions League spot for the following season.
Realistic assessment: This is a long shot. Typically England, Spain, Italy, or Germany dominate seasonal rankings. But it’s not impossible, especially if Dutch clubs peak while top leagues have down years. Even earning this bonus once per decade would provide significant coefficient and revenue boosts.
Conference League Mastery
Dutch clubs are gaining expertise in the Conference League through experience. They understand the opposition quality, tactical demands, and strategic approaches.
Opportunity: The Netherlands could produce Conference League finalists or winners regularly (every 2-3 years), generating massive coefficient points. West Ham’s 2023 victory showed English clubs take it seriously; Dutch clubs should too.
Strategic advantage: The Conference League offers Dutch clubs better odds of deep runs than Champions League, where they face Europe’s absolute elite. Prioritizing Conference League success (when clubs are in it) could yield better coefficient returns than modest Champions League group stage performances.
Belgium and Portugal’s Vulnerabilities
Belgium’s challenge: Their rise has been impressive but might not be sustainable. Belgian clubs have limited revenue compared to top-five leagues. If they can’t retain key players, their European improvement could plateau.
Portugal’s dependence: Portuguese football is heavily reliant on three giant clubs (Benfica, Porto, Sporting). If those three have a collective down year, Portugal’s coefficient suffers dramatically because smaller Portuguese clubs contribute minimally.
Netherlands’ advantage: With six European spots and improving depth, the Netherlands has more coefficient engines. Even if Ajax struggles, PSV, Feyenoord, AZ, Twente, and Utrecht can compensate. This breadth provides resilience.
Youth Development Payoff
The Eredivisie’s reputation for developing young talent could translate into sustained European success if clubs adjust their transfer strategies.
Current model: Develop players ages 18-22, sell at peak value (age 22-23)
Adjusted model: Retain key players through age 23-25, allowing them to mature and contribute to deeper European runs, then sell at still-high values
Financial viability: European success generates revenue that reduces pressure to sell immediately. A virtuous cycle could develop: better European results → more revenue → can retain players longer → even better European results.
Collective Mentality Advantage
Few European leagues have achieved the Netherlands’ level of coefficient awareness and cooperation. If this unity persists—and intensifies—it provides a competitive edge.
Example: If Dutch clubs genuinely treat rivals’ European matches as important to their own futures, they’ll adjust behavior in ways that compound benefits. The collective becomes stronger than the sum of individual clubs.
The Bottom Line: Projections Through 2030
Based on current trajectories and realistic assessments:
Most likely scenario (60% probability):
- Netherlands maintains 6th place through 2028-29
- Occasional close calls with Portugal but survives
- Belgium closes gap but doesn’t overtake
- Allocation remains 6 teams with 2 direct Champions League spots
- Coefficient fluctuates between 58-65 points
Optimistic scenario (25% probability):
- Netherlands strengthens position at 6th
- Gap to Portugal widens to 8-10 points
- Occasional challenges to France for 5th (though doesn’t achieve it)
- One or two European Performance Spot bonuses earned
- Coefficient rises to 65-70 points
Pessimistic scenario (15% probability):
- Netherlands drops to 7th by 2027-28
- Belgium also threatens by 2029-30
- Ajax’s struggles continue, PSV/Feyenoord can’t compensate fully
- Allocation reduces to 5 teams with 1 direct Champions League spot
- Coefficient falls to 52-58 points
The next five years will reveal whether Dutch football’s resurgence was the beginning of sustained excellence or a temporary peak. The infrastructure is in place, the clubs understand what’s required, and the collective mentality has coalesced. What remains uncertain is whether execution will match ambition when the margins are so thin and the competition so fierce.
For Eredivisie fans, every European match over the next five seasons carries existential weight. That September group stage game, that July qualifier, that Conference League playoff—they’re all battles in a larger war to maintain the Netherlands’ place among Europe’s elite, with tens of millions of euros and an entire generation’s European heritage hanging in the balance.
Related Articles:
The Division 
Leave a comment